News
Crime
[11/20]
Ind. inmates sneak through ceiling to have sex
[11/19]
'That's my cat!' says man with bat
[11/18]
Ky. inmate who escaped jail returns on own
[11/11]
Mass. bank robber allegedly caught 'red handed'
[11/10]
Cops have tough time finding sober driver for boy
More...
Top Headlines
[11/20]
U.S. Top Court Won't Review Dismissal of MySpace Rape Case
[11/20]
Defense Department Contract Law Unconstitutional, Court Says
[11/20]
Judge orders release of 5 terror suspects at Gitmo
[11/20]
US charges defense contractor with Afghan murder
[11/20]
Mistrial denied in Atlanta courthouse shooting
More...
Case Summaries
Criminal Law & Procedure
[11/20]
Vasquez v. State of California In a taxpayer cause of action brought against the state for violating Proposition 139, known as the Prison Inmate Labor Initiative of 1990, by failing to collect and disburse payments due from joint venture programs with private employers within state prisons, award of attorneys' fees to plaintiff-company representive under the "private attorney general statute", Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, is affirmed where: 1) no rule applicable to this case required plaintiff first to attempt to settle the matter short of litigation; 2) the present case is not a catalyst case because plaintiff successfully obtained a stipulated injunction that was entered as a judgment and thus brought about a judicially recognized change in the parties' legal relationship; and 3) the "limitations on the catalyst theory" adopted in Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. did not properly apply here.
[11/20]
In Re: Amendments to Fla. R. Crim. P. In response to an out-of-cycle report of the Florida Bar's Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, the court adopts the committee's proposed amendments to conform the rules to recent legislation.
[11/20]
US v. Nevils Conviction for being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition is reversed where the evidence offered with respect to the element of knowing possession was insufficient.
[11/20]
Doody v. Schriro In a habeas proceeding following convictions for murder and robbery, denial of petition for relief is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the state court's holding that defendant received adequate Miranda warnings was not an unreasonable application of clearly-established federal law; but 2) police coercion of defendant's confession over a twelve-hour period of interrogation rendered it involuntary.
[11/19]
US v. Daughenbaugh Conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed over an objection that defendant's guilty plea was invalid because he had not knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to indictment.
More...
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
|
Contact an Experienced Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer
Please contact Joseph M. Norwood if you, a friend, or a member of your family needs an experienced Tulsa criminal defense attorney. I represent clients from throughout the Tulsa metropolitan area and northeast Oklahoma.
Attorney Joseph M. Norwood represents clients located throughout Tulsa, Oklahoma, and the surrounding areas, including the communities of Sapulpa, Broken Arrow, Owasso, Collinsville, Sand Springs, Bixby, Glenpool, Muskogee, and Tulsa County.